Need assistance with Research Data Management or interested in learning more?
Reach out to us at
Jia Wu, Metadata/Systems Librarian: jwu@yukonu.ca
Anna Krangle-Long, Grant Facilitator and Research Engagement Coordinator:
Discover how to conduct ethical and respectful research that aligns with Indigenous values and sovereignty in our library guide Truth and Reconciliation: Respectful Research.
Indigenous data sovereignty refers to the right of Indigenous Peoples to collect, access, analyze, interpret, manage, distribute, and reuse all data that was derived from or relates to their communities.
Indigenous data sovereignty advocates for self-determination and self-governance, meaning that Indigenous Peoples would control all aspects of the research process, from idea conception to use of resulting data. Without Indigenous data sovereignty, there is no way to ensure that Indigenous data reflects the rich diversity in Indigenous worldviews, ways of knowing, priorities, cultures, and values (Walter & Suina, 2019).
Indigenous data includes any information about and from Indigenous communities, individuals, lands or resources. This can range from demographic data to cultural knowledge, language and information about wildlife and ecosystems.
The Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy acknowledges that data related to research by and with Indigenous communities must be managed in accordance with data management principles. These include, but are not limited to considerations of data collection, ownership, protection, use and sharing.
The policy states that:
"For research conducted by and with First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities, collectives and organizations, DMPs must be co-developed with these communities, collectives and organizations, in accordance with RDM principles or DMP formats that they accept. DMPs in the context of research by and with First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities, collectives and organizations should recognize Indigenous data sovereignty and include options for renegotiation of the DMP."
Co-developed by Indigenous communities and the Canada Research Coordinating Committee, this initiative provides links to resources and policies related to Indigenous research and research training model that contributes to reconciliation.
Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy - Frequently Asked Questions - 2. Indigenous research
Data as Relation: Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Ethic of Care [Webinar recording]
By using the concept of Indigenous relationality, this talk will unpack how when we change our perception of Indigenous data and data ownership, we can become ethical stewards of data, and work towards Indigenous data sovereignty practices.
The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance offer a framework for the ethical use and management of Indigenous data. The principles complement the FAIR principles and emphasize the crucial role of data in advancing Indigenous innovation and self-determination.
|
Image: BeFAIRandCARE is licensed under CC BY 4.0 |
CARE stands for:
Developed by the First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC), The OCAP® principles establish how First Nations’ data and information will be collected, protected, used, or shared.
OCAP® stands for:
Ownership - First Nations communities or groups own data collectively in the same way that an individual owns his or her personal information
Control - First Nations can seek control over all aspects of the research cycles that impact them
Access - First Nations must have access to data and information about themselves and their communities, regardless of where this data is stored. Additionally, First Nations have the right to manage and decide on access to their data.
Possession - First Nations retain physical control of the data
The Principles of Ethical Métis Research, established by the Métis Centre at the National Aboriginal Health Organization (NAHO), provide a framework to guide research that respects Métis values, traditions, and self-determination. These principles should be considered as a starting point for engaging Métis communities in ethical research, rather than enforceable rules. The NAHO identifies six principles of ethical Métis research:
Reciprocal Relationships - Building relationships between researchers and communities, while sharing responsibility and benefits, and learning from each other
“Respect for” - Individual & collective; autonomy; identity; personal values; gender; confidentiality; practices & protocols
Safe and Inclusive Environments - Research should be safe for all - youth & Elders; gender and sexual identity; aboriginality; and balance individual and collective
Recognize Diversity - Within & between Métis communities; in worldviews; in values & beliefs; in geographic orientation & in politics
“Research Should” - Be relevant; benefit all; accurate; accountable; responsible; acknowledge contribution; & protect Métis cultural knowledge
Métis Context - Understand history, values, & knowledge; advance Métis methodology & include Métis experts; straddle worldviews; & insider-outsider perspective
The National Inuit Strategy on Research (NISR) targets governments, academia, and research institutions and identifies areas for partnership and action that can strengthen the impact, efficacy, and usefulness of Inuit Nunangat research for Inuit.
The NISR identifies five priority areas to advance Inuit Research:
Priority Area 1: Advance Inuit Governance in Research
Priority Area 2: Enhance the Ethical Conduct of Research
Priority Area 3: Align Funding with Inuit Research Priorities
Priority Area 4: Ensure Inuit Access, Ownership, and Control over Data and Information
Priority Area 5: Build Capacity in Inuit Nunangat Research
The Council of Yukon First Nations serve the needs of First Nations within the Yukon and the MacKenzie Delta. The council's mandate is to serve as a political advocacy organization for Yukon First Nations holding traditional territories, to protect their rights. titles, and interests.
The workshop describes and defines data-sharing or information-sharing agreements, outlines key considerations in choosing when these should potentially be contractual or non-contractual in nature, and provides an annotated outline and examples of these agreements.
This workshop provides practical templates and tips associated with ethically gathering and presenting community engagement data, with specific focus on consent statements, disclaimers, analysis processes, reporting products, and overarching policy and guidelines.
A platform for sharing tools and experiences related to research involving Indigenous and local communities.
Traditional Knowledge Research Guidelines A Guide for Researchers in the Yukon (The Council of Yukon First Nations, 2000)
Decolonizing Data: Indigenous Data Sovereignty Primer (Open North, 2017)
Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities, a Guide for Researchers
Indigenous Digital Literacies (Connie Strayer and Robyn Grebliunas, 2024)
First Nations data sovereignty in Canada (The First Nations Information Governance Centre, 2019)
Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures (Carroll, S.R., Herczog, E., Hudson, M. et al., 2021)